Hello everyone…. Today, we’re going to discuss an important topic that impacts not only our country but millions around the world: the future of the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID. We’ll explore the ongoing discussions involving Elon Musk and Donald Trump about the potential shutdown of USAID. I’ll cover the historical context, the legal implications, why USAID represents less than 1% of the U.S. federal budget, and our moral obligations toward global humanitarian aid.

To start, let’s look back at where this conversation began. Since 2017, during Trump’s first term, he has criticized USAID and suggested merging it with the State Department to streamline operations. Now, as Trump embarks on his second term—having been elected last November and sworn in recently—the discussions about dismantling USAID are resurfacing. However, it’s essential to recognize that any attempt to shut down USAID without congressional approval would violate the Constitution. This agency was approved by Congress in 1961, and it is established by law. Trump cannot just eliminate it unilaterally.

Let’s talk about the actual role of USAID in our budget. While $50 billion may sound like a lot, it’s important to remember that it represents less than 1% of the total U.S. federal budget. In the grand scheme of our economy, this is a small amount, especially when we consider the pressing need for humanitarian assistance around the world. The U.S. contributes roughly 23% of total global development assistance, a figure that underlines our vital role on the world stage. While this may seem generous, it’s crucial to remember that our contributions also stem from a robust and equitable economy that can sustain such efforts.

To understand the broader context, let’s examine tax disparities and their impact on public perception of aid. Back in 1978, I worked for one of the largest payroll processing companies in the U.S. One of our clients was a prominent magazine known for its great articles and captivating images. I observed how much they earned and what they paid in taxes. A photographer for that magazine cleared an extraordinary $1 million every two weeks; I have no idea what else this man did for the magazine, but that number is staggering. Yes, the tax rate may have been 50%, which sounds high, but for someone making that kind of income, tax payments are just a number on paper.

In contrast, let’s look at the impact on someone making $60,000 a year in 2023. With 37% taken in taxes, their take-home pay is just about $37,800. This is a significant burden compared to what higher earners experience. This disparity stems from policies rooted in previous administrations, including Ronald Reagan’s era, and it’s crucial for us to grasp this frame of reference. While your taxes may feel high, those of wealthy individuals aren’t bearing the same load. This inequity contributes to many of us effectively paying for their membership in the USA, making it imperative to address these tax structures to foster a healthier balance in our society.

Now, this brings us to the importance of our moral responsibilities. As citizens, we must contemplate how we can help those in need. What is our obligation to support others globally? Historically, charitable giving is deeply rooted in our society, but many Americans give less than the traditional 10% tithe. With the pressing need for global assistance, we can find ways to balance our financial responsibilities while ensuring that those who rely on support receive it.

Consider volunteering your time, advocating for policies that promote fair taxation, or donating to organizations that align with your values. Every action counts and contributes to a greater impact.

In conclusion, the ongoing discussion about USAID sheds light on significant ethical responsibilities we all share. As we assess the potential changes to this agency, let’s prioritize the humanitarian needs at stake. It’s important to recognize that a fair tax structure can strengthen our capacity to support global efforts. It is not just a matter of giving more to the world around us; it is about equitable income and taxation levels for the nation as a whole.

Thank you for your time today. Let’s keep these important issues in mind and work together toward meaningful solutions!