After the successful April 5, 2025, a very frightening post surfaced on Bluesky. This is my rebuttal to On April 20th, 2025, the United States may cross the point of no return by Aletheisthenes:

The article by Aletheisthenes raises alarm about a potential authoritarian shift in the U.S. It paints a dramatic picture of how the government might use the Insurrection Act to impose martial law. However, this perspective can be analyzed through a counterintelligence lens, especially in light of historical programs like COINTELPRO.

COINTELPRO, run by the FBI, aimed to disrupt political groups and movements. It targeted civil rights organizations, feminist groups, and others. The tactics included misinformation, infiltration, and manipulation. These strategies sowed distrust and division among citizens.

Aletheisthenes’ article may echo some COINTELPRO tactics. It amplifies fear and suspicion. It suggests a coordinated effort by various groups, creating a narrative of impending chaos. This kind of messaging can create division and paranoia. It can lead people to distrust their neighbors and even their government.

The article urges readers to prepare for a “coup.” It encourages a defensive stance against potential government actions. This may provoke unnecessary unrest and fear. In a way, it mirrors how COINTELPRO sought to instigate conflict among groups.

Instead of promoting active political engagement, the article focuses on possible violence and repression. Encouraging people to resist without clear, peaceful alternatives can backfire. It could lead individuals to take extreme actions based on fear rather than reasoned discourse.

To respond effectively to potential authoritarianism, people should focus on strengthening democracy. This means promoting civil dialogue, understanding differing opinions, and building resilience.

While the potential for government overreach exists, one must critically assess sources of information. Fear-based narratives may serve a divisive purpose similar to past counterintelligence efforts. Instead of giving in to panic, citizens should unite around democratic values and open communication.

Sources: